Planning and financing

Recently, we attended a talk by Istvan Balyi, an imminent sports figure, who spoke in part about the importance of planning for successful completion of athletic goals. He gave the specific example that if there's an event in two years time the plan and budget should be created in the first year, including hiring coaches and managers. He suggested that planning session would be a two day process involving representatives of all the necessary constituencies.

The budget is a concern, of course, as it can dictate what you can do in those two years of preparation. But he stressed that the quality of the planning and the implementation of that plan can drive financial contributions from sponsors.

This makes sense. Consider someone coming to you, as a potential sponsor, and they say either (a) please sponsor our sport, or (b) please sponsor our sport so we can promote it better (for example), or (c) please sponsor our sport so we can promote it better and here's our detailed plan on how we are going to do so. Which of those options are you most likely to support with your money?

Both USA Racquetball (USAR) and Racquetball Canada have embarked on new fundraising efforts, and here's how they're doing so.

USA Racquetball

In a letter "to the Racquetball Players Of America," USAR President Cheryl Kirk and Executive Director James Hiser outlined what the USAR does, including tournament organizing, regulation of rules and regulations, USA National Team administration, facilitating communication within the racquetball community, and some provisions for insurance and risk management.

Moreover, they stated that the USAR has "an aggressive agenda," which includes (a) "working with venues (clubs, universities, YMCAs, etc.) to position and maintain racquetball as a great sport and fitness activity - "Fitness and Fun, Rolled Into One!", (b) "creating and supplying promotional materials for marketing and visibility," and (c) "providing mechanisms (e.g., portable court, TV, on-line broadcasts) to bring the sport to the masses."

To this end, USAR will be increasing their annual membership dues to $50 from $35 as of January 1, 2009, and further ask for "occasional financial contribution[s] to USAR" when possible.

Whether the USAR's plans are detailed enough to convince sponsors and individuals to contribute is an open question. To grow the game, they will need to convince sponsors outside of the sport that it is an activity worth supporting. It's not enough to preach to the choir.

A plan also has to be evaluated, so as to identify what was successful and what wasn't. Doing so will mean some form of measurement. The three items Kirk and Hiser highlighted from their "aggressive agenda" won't be the easiest to evaluate, because they aren't the easiest to measure. How will we know if enough promotional materials were created to make racquetball more visible and marketable? (and how are we going to measure racquetball's visibility and marketablity?) How will we know if enough work has been done with facilities to best position racquetball as "Fitness and Fun, Rolled Into One!"?

Moreover, these are things that aren't completely in the control of USAR. That is, the USAR could work as hard as possible with facilities, but if a facility perceives the wind is blowing more favorably for another sport or activity, then anything the USAR does may be ineffective in changing that facility's opinion.

In short, while the USAR's agenda is aggressive, achieving its goals will be difficult.

Racquetball Canada

Racquetball Canada has embarked on a "Shop and Support" program to raise funds. It is asking its members to purchase gift cards to use for their retail purchases, and a small percentage of the gift cards purchased will go back to Racquetball Canada. Thus, using these cards when shopping for groceries or buying gas, for example, would benefit Racquetball Canada.

However, Racquetball Canada has not issued any planning statement on what they would do with the raised funds or even why they need them. One could speculate on why more funds are needed and what they would be used for, but again would you be more willing to financially support someone just because he or she asks for the money or someone who comes to you with a complete plan - including how they will measure their performance and evaluate the outcome of their plan?

If you were a venture capitalist, sometimes called a dragon, whose venture would you support?

Planning and volunteers

Planning is fundamentally important in any activity, and good plans can encourage contributions both financial and voluntary. Organizations that have clear plans can be more successful in recruiting volunteers, because they will know what to look for in their volunteers and what to ask of or tell potential volunteers.

When someone asks you to do something, isn't your first question going to be "what exactly do you want me to do?" before you decide whether to help or not? If the person has a clear answer for you, then you'll be more likely to help than if they hum and haw about it and don't really seem to know what they want from you.

Planning isn't a lot of fun. We don't imagine that Balyi's suggested two planning days for a two year sport cycle would two fun filled days, as they'd basically be two days of meetings.

However, not doing the necessary planning could mean even less fun down the road, because without adequate planning there are no achievements or progress to our goals.

As is often said, failing to plan is planning to fail.

TRB's Santa Claus

If The Racquetball Blog was Santa Claus, or had an in with Father Christmas, then these are some of the gifts that some racquetball people would find under their trees on Christmas morning.

To Dave Negrete, Commissioner of the International Racquetball Tour (IRT) and Shannon Feaster, Commissioner of the Women's Professional Racquetball Organization (WPRO): major non-racquetball sponsors that would allow them to continue to move forward in developing professional racquetball, especially with broadcasting and webcasting matches to the masses.

To the International Racquetball Federation (IRF): more accurate and timely reporting of matches and tournament outcomes.

To Rocky Carson and Jack Huczek: a strong drive serve that will allow them to be more competitive on Kane Waselenchuk.

To Kane Waselenchuk: wisdom to match his athletic gifts so that he doesn't repeat past mistakes.

To Jason Mannino: good health that will allow him to win another IRT tournament.

To Rhonda Rajsich and Paola Longoria: continued success on the WPRO tour.

To Cheryl Gudinas Holmes and Kerri Wachtel: another tournament win on the WPRO tour.

To Kristen Bellows, Alvaro Beltran, Ben Croft, Angela Grisar, Shane Vanderson, and Mitch Williams: a pro tournament win in '09.

To Veronica Sotomayor: a spot in the semi-finals at a full WPRO tour stop, and a tournament victory in such an event.

To the up and coming IRT and WPRO players: breakout wins that show the big players that they can't be complacent and the rest of us that pro tournaments aren't just about the top few players, but other players can make some noise too.

To Geoff Thomsen of Double Donut Studios: the ability get to some racquetball events, especially the US Open, and take more good pictures.

To all the racquetball companies: strong sales and solid bottom lines especially in these trying economic times.

To all racquetball players: good health for 2009, lots opportunities to play, and some flat roll outs.

Happy Holidays everyone!

From The Racquetball Blog

Follow the bouncing ball....

Latest Pro Rankings

Both the International Racquetball Tour (IRT) and Women's Professional Racquetball Organization (WPRO) issued new rankings two weeks ago, but with all the World Junior competitions, we haven't reported them here.

There's no change in the IRT rankings, but it does reaffirm that Kane Waselenchuk has made it into the top 8. Thus, he will not have to go through qualifying at the next IRT event, which will be the California Open January 8-11, 2009. That will be followed by the New York City Pro-Am, which will be the following weekend in Syosett, New York (on Long Island).

IRT Rankings (December 8, 2008)

Rank - Pro - Points - Previous Rank
1 - Rocky Carson - 4676 - 1
2 - Jack Huczek - 4421 - 2
3 - Alvaro Beltran - 3379 - 3
4 - Jason Mannino - 3278 - 4
5 - Ben Croft - 2554 - 5
6 - Shane Vanderson - 2513 - 6
7 - Mitch Williams - 2355 - 7
8 - Kane Waselenchuk - 2148 - 8
9 - Chris Crowther - 2100 - 9
10 - Jason Thoerner - 1988 - 10
11 - Juan Herrera - 1421 - 11
12 - Andy Hawthorne - 1414 - 12
13 - Alejandro Herrera - 1218 - 13
14 - Javier Moreno - 1151 - 14
15 - Hiroshi Shimizu - 1088 - 15
16 - Kris Odegard - 975 - 16
17 - Travis Woodbury - 930 - 17
18 - Andres Herrera - 714 - 18
19 - Tony Carson - 597 - 20
20 - Lee Connell - 593 - 19

These WPRO rankings were issued prior to the Christmas Classic in Arlington, Virginia, where Rhonda Rajsich defeated Paola Longoria in the final. That should put Longoria closer to Cheryl Gudinas Holmes, but it seems Longoria will need a few more good results before she can over take Gudinas Holmes for second spot.

Also, Veronica Sotomayor is up two places in these rankings from the November 3 rankings based on her win in the New Jersey Open, where she defeated Aimee Ruiz (also up in these rankings), Doreen Fowler and in the final, Rajsich.

WPRO Rankings (as of December 11, 2008)
Rank - Name - Points
1 - Rhonda Rajsich - 1651.28
2 - Cheryl Gudinas Holmes - 1436.20
3 - Paola Longoria - 804.50
4 - Kerri Wachtel - 770.70
5 - Angela Grisar - 696.50
6 - Kristen Bellows - 584.50
7 - Adrienne Fisher - 426.44
8 - Brenda Kyzer - 387.50
9 - Doreen Fowler - 331.40
10 - Jo Shattuck - 268.25
11 - Veronica Sotomayor - 208.70
12 - Diane Moore - 203.00
13 - Samantha Salas - 201.00
14 - Vivian Gomez - 178.50
15 - Kimi Ferina - 170.58
16 - TJ Baumbaugh - 167.66
17 - Keely Franks - 155.00
18 - Jennifer Saunders - 151.50
19 - Christie Van Hees - 102.00
20 - Candi Hostovich - 88.50

Follow the bouncing ball....